jama
 

Jama Blog: Leverage your collective genius.









Posts Tagged ‘frustrations’

The Top 5 Frustrations of Project Managers and Tips on How to Avoid Them: Part 5 of 5

Thursday, November 10th, 2011

5. FRUSTRATION: Mismatched expectations.

A stakeholder thinks he is getting X, Y & Z and is actually getting X, A & B.

It feels like a punch in the gut. You and your team put your blood, sweat and tears into delivering a project only to learn after the launch that the end users aren’t happy.

What the heck happened? How did we miss the mark? Where did the expectation gap come from?

TIP: Be proactive.

People have selective memories. We all remember what we want to hear. What stakeholders forget is the additional things they add along the way or the reprioritization of features as the scope evolves over time. The X becomes X+1, and the Y becomes Y+2 and soon Z is out and instead the priority shifted to A and B, but not everyone was clear on the trade-offs that were made because the decision was made over the phone from a late night call with the customer.

The intent was right, the team was being agile, but what was missing was the captured communication with the stakeholders documenting the requests, agreements and approvals by the appropriate stakeholders.

Next time, get buy-in on the priorities and capture the justification of what’s in and what’s out of a project, to ensure everyone has the same expectations.

Without adding a lot of unnecessary overhead, new tools offer the capability to capture the reviews, approvals and electronic signatures for scope changes as part of the natural workflow. That way everyone can feel confident they know the true plan and the team can feel good about delivering what’s promised. You deserve to have the launch event be a celebration not an interrogation of what went wrong.

Read part 1, 2, 3, or 4, or download the entire whitepaper here.

The Top 5 Frustrations of Project Managers and Tips on How to Avoid Them: Part 4 of 5

Thursday, November 3rd, 2011

4. FRUSTRATION: Attention deficit.

Creating a detailed 200-page plan that no one has time to read once, let alone every time a change occurs.

You did it. You just completed a month-long effort eliciting feedback from 50 stakeholders and writing the most beautiful requirements document of your life. From a CMMI or BABOK perspective, it is pure poetry of shall statements and use cases. Ok, enjoy that moment for about 30 seconds, because it will quickly be replaced with the fear of whether anyone will actually ever read it.

As project complexity increases, how do you articulate what the plan is without creating a monster of a document? It’s tough. The issue might not be the length of the complete specification document. The issue is that you’re trying to communicate the entire plan to everyone using the document. In reality, most people only work on and care about specific parts of the plan at any given time.

When one item changes and you send a new version of the entire requirements document, it’s both information overload and white noise at the same time. We can’t expect people to hunt and peck for what changed and determine each time if it’s relevant to them or not. This old way is incredibly inefficient, and people just stop paying attention.

TIP: Be relevant.

Adopt the philosophy that everyone is simply too busy to absorb the entire document. Because literally, they are. To avoid being frustrated by your organization’s collective attention deficit, relevancy is key.

This is an area where tools can help you break large, complex projects into smaller manageable parts, and let people filter in on what’s relevant to them. We recommend you manage the scope of projects item by item to get work done.

If you’re curious what we mean by “item,” a requirement is an item. A use case is an item. A test case is an item. A defect is an item.

People naturally work on a list of a few items at a time. It’s how our brains work and we’re more productive that way. By itemizing the scope of your projects using a tool with a relational database, it will allow people to focus on specific items they are working on, while maintain context of the overall project.

Then, as needed for baselines, releases or other milestones, you can group together items and summarize the project via reports or a specification document for a holistic view.

Read part 1, 2, 3 or download full whitepaper here.

The Top 5 Frustrations of Project Managers and Tips on How to Avoid Them: Part 3 of 5

Monday, October 31st, 2011

3. FRUSTRATION: Change Tax.

Manually sending updates to everyone when something changes kills third of your day.

Anytime you’re doing something manually, ask yourself, “Can we automate this?” With today’s tools, often the answer is “yes.” In the case of executing complex projects, change is just something that’s going to happen. And, often for good reasons. As you get deeper into the design and development of a project, you know more than you did at the beginning. Thus, you and your team will think of better ways to build the desired product as you iterate upon the requirements along the way. If you try to manage versions by tracking changes in Word documents, then you’re going to experience a huge tax on your time. It’s nearly impossible to write the perfect requirements document the first time. So stop believing that’s a goal.

TIP: Be agile.

Embrace changes intelligently by connecting the dots, quickly assessing the impact and communicating the changes to the right people involved automatically.

We can’t talk about requirements without talking about change. And we can’t talk about change without talking about being “agile.”

The #1 reason to adopt agile within your organization is to create a culture that is nimble so your team can respond quickly and effectively to changing requirements. Thus, iterating as you go.

Don’t get hung up on the labels or the debate of whether Scrum vs. Kanban is superior. There is no definitive, one-size-fits-all process. Agile first and foremost is a cultural mindset, not a prescriptive development process.

You want your entire organization to feel empowered to propose a change if they find a better solution. If you’re coming from a more traditional Waterfall approach, your challenge with adopting agile is to avoid going from one extreme to the next. There is a myth that agile is about not having a plan and just building – which isn’t the case for most organizations. Smart agile teams maintain requirements best practices borrowed from traditional methods such as traceability, impact analysis and change management, so they can understand the ripple effect that a change has on the rest of the project. It’s a balancing act between agility and formal control. Some call it a hybrid approach. Again, the labels don’t matter. The key is to find the mix of techniques that works best for your team so you can execute projects without friction. That’s what matters.

The Top 5 Frustrations of Project Managers and Tips on How to Avoid Them: Part 2 of 5

Friday, October 28th, 2011

2. FRUSTRATION: Decision rehashing.

Hosting endless meetings where half the time is wasted revisiting old decisions or bringing others up to speed.

We’ll admit this one drives us crazy. We dislike meetings. But, we especially dislike meetings that are monopolized by rehashing decisions already made. “Why did we decide to change the functionality of that feature?” “When did we approve that?” “Bruce was out last week, can we revisit the plan so he’s up to speed?” Painful, inefficient, frustrating.

TIP: Be clear.

Provide full context of the decisions being made so everyone understands the scope of the project and why. People need clarity and understanding to execute at their best.

This applies upstream to your stakeholders and customers so they understand what they’re getting and it applies downstream to your design, development and QA teams so they know exactly what to build and to test properly. As a solution, new collaborative tools exist that will help you capture the healthy debates and ongoing discussions that naturally take place around requirements, and they don’t require hosting more meetings. People can add their feedback anytime and see what others are saying to agree or disagree, approve or reject, or propose edits to refine the solution.

Also, the decisions that occur in meetings aren’t easily tracked in documents and people’s memories fade as time goes on. How many times have you left a meeting feeling great, thinking everyone is on the same page, only to find yourself debating what the team decided a few weeks later?

If this is an issue for your organization, adopt a new technique to capture decisions in line with requirements, and make them easy for the team to view anytime. This will eliminate ambiguity and ensure that decisions about the project are crystal clear.

Read part 1 of 5 here.


How can we help?

Toll-Free: 1 (800) 679-3058
Direct: (503) 922-1058
Fax: (877) 665-8476

Jama Headquarters
600 NW 14th Ave. Suite 200
Portland, Oregon 97209
support@jamasoftware.com
sales@jamasoftware.com

Connect with Jama online:

           


CONTOUR
Overview
USD Pricing
Euro Pricing
Videos
Screenshots
Features
Why Contour
What's New
Review Center
Integrations
Technology
Download Contour
Free Trial
Request Demo
Login



CUSTOMERS
Overview
Government
Customer List
Success Stories
Testimonials

RESOURCES
News
Webinars
Whitepapers
Blog
Twitter

SUPPORT
Overview
Training
Pro Services
Support Forum
Documentation

COMPANY
About Us
Jama Partners
Management Team
Board & Advisors
Careers
Contact Us
Privacy  |  Legal  |  Preferences  |  Enjoy the Journey